Decision Intelligence is what happens when extracted decisions can be reviewed, assigned, and tracked toward an outcome.
Summaries describe what was said. Decision Intelligence checks extracted decisions for possible governance gaps and helps people record follow-up. The numeric score is a rule-based heuristic, not a validated measure of decision quality or future success. No score is shown when no decisions are extracted. Review AI extraction and recommendations before acting.
Free 7-day trial · No credit card · Cancel anytime
Why this is its own category
Three adjacent tool categories all stop short of governing the decision.
AI summarisers turn the conversation into clean prose. That's helpful for catching up — but a summary can't tell you whether a decision was actually made, who owns it, or whether it played out three weeks later. It describes the meeting; it doesn't measure it.
Transcripts are searchable, but they're a record of words, not a record of accountability. A transcript will tell you that the team discussed the launch date. It won't tell you that nobody actually decided what the date is.
Project-management tools are excellent at tracking the work that comes out of a decision — but they assume the decision has already been made cleanly, with an owner, somewhere outside the tool. That assumption is exactly where most organisations leak: the decision lived in a meeting, and now it lives in nobody's head.
Decision Intelligence is the missing layer between the conversation and the work. It scores the meeting, names the decider, registers the decision, fires the check-in, and records the outcome — so what was decided, and what actually happened, both end up in the same searchable place.
The five pillars of Decision Intelligence
Each pillar maps to one failure mode that summaries, transcripts, and project tools leave open. Together they form the AideNote governance loop.
Pillar 1 · Score
Governance score
A numeric heuristic based on gap checks on extracted decisions. It is not a validated quality or outcome measure; no score is shown without extracted decisions.
Pillar 2 · Registry
Decision registry with deciders
Review extracted decisions in a searchable registry and confirm their deciders. Extraction may miss decisions or infer an incorrect owner.
Pillar 3 · Outcomes
Decision outcomes
Pick a check-in date, get a one-click email when it's due, record whether the decision played out, partially landed, didn't, or was too early to tell.
Pillar 4 · Ownership
Action item ownership
Review action items and fill in or correct owners, due dates, and statuses. Follow-up and recorded outcomes require human input.
Pillar 5 · Analytics
Analytics across meetings
Trends across your full meeting history: governance score over time, decisions losing momentum, completion rates by team and by decider.
What changes when you adopt Decision Intelligence
Four shifts you can measure within a quarter — not because the meetings change, but because what comes out of them does.
Decisions stop getting re-litigated
When every decision has a named decider and a registry entry, the same conversation stops happening three meetings in a row. The argument moves to "did we follow through?" instead of "what did we decide?"
QBRs and exec updates stop being archaeology
"What did we decide last quarter and did it hold up?" becomes a registry query, not a two-hour reconstruction from Slack threads and old docs. The data is already there — scored, owned, and outcome-tagged.
Executives get visibility into decision health
Leadership stops asking "how are meetings going?" and starts asking "which decisions are losing momentum?" — because the answer is now a panel, not a feeling. Drift becomes measurable, and the worst-offending recurring meetings are named.
The Chief of Staff stops being the human archive
When the registry is the source of truth, you stop relying on one person's memory of what got committed in last month's leadership sync. The role shifts back to strategy, not retrieval.
See patterns across recurring meetings
Single-meeting scoring tells you what happened in the room. Meeting Series tells you what's happening to the cadence — the weekly 1:1, the monthly steering, the quarterly board — by rolling up decisions, follow-through, and momentum across every instance of the same recurring meeting.
Group recurring meetings into a Series
Tag every instance of the same meeting — "Weekly Exec Sync", "Monthly Pipeline Review" — so each new recording slots into a shared timeline instead of sitting alone.
Longitudinal decision rollup
Review available extracted decisions across a series, with recorded deciders and outcomes. Missing or deleted records are not included, and people must confirm the information.
Momentum & follow-through over time
Track governance score trend, action-item completion rate, and decision-outcome mix per series — so drift in a recurring meeting becomes a measurable signal, not a hunch.
Surface the worst-offending recurring meetings
A ranked view of which series consistently produce vague decisions, unowned actions, or stalled commitments — the meetings most worth fixing first.
Available on Pro and Enterprise plans.
Score your first meeting free
See what Decision Intelligence looks like on a real meeting of yours — governance score, named deciders, registry entries — in under a minute.
Get started